Risk informed decision-making and its ethical basis

نویسندگان

  • Gerhard Ersdal
  • Terje Aven
چکیده

In decision-making under uncertainty there are two main questions that need to be evaluated: (i) What are the future consequences and associated uncertainties of an action, and (ii) what is a good (or right) decision or action. Philosophically these issues are categorized as epistemic questions (i.e. questions of knowledge) and ethical questions (i.e. questions of moral and norms). This paper discusses the second issue, and evaluates different risk management approaches for establishing good decisions, using different ethical theories as a basis. These theories include the utilitarian ethics of Bentley and Mills, and deontological ethics of Kant, Rawls and Habermas. The risk management approaches include cost–benefit analysis (CBA), minimum safety criterion, the ALARP principle and the precautionary

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluating the Level of Ethical Decision Making of Nurses and Its Relationship with the Attitudes of End-Of-Life Care of Patients with COVID-19

Nurses are among the members of the treatment team who have the most contact with Corona Virus Disease- 2019 (COVID-19) patients and their ethical decision-making is inevitable during patient care. On the other hand, nurses' motivation to implement end-of-life care is influenced by their attitude, awareness, and moral reasoning. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of ethical deci...

متن کامل

Rethinking Autonomy and Consent in Healthcare Ethics

In healthcare ethics, autonomy has arguably become the ‘principal principle’. As a principle that can be readily turned into a process, the giving of ‘informed consent’ by a patient has become the surrogate measure of whether medical interventions are ethically acceptable. While ‘informed consent’ processes in medical care are presumed to be robust, research confirms that most patients do not a...

متن کامل

The federal government and academic texts as barriers to informed consent.

Informed patient consent for medical treatment is required by both law and medical ethics. Yet, both federal agencies and academicians are participating in the suppression of information about the heightened risk of breast cancer posed by oral contraceptives and induced abortion. There is historical precedent in the long-delayed acknowledgement of the smoking/lung cancer link. By law, a patient...

متن کامل

Medication-free research in early episode schizophrenia: why on earth would I choose to participate in such research?

The author concurs with Bola's conclusion that "a categorical prohibition of medication-free research in early episode schizophrenia on the ethical grounds of harm to human subjects should probably be reconsidered" on a case-by-case basis. The point that informed choice is rarely considered in the informed consent process is made. Several recommendations are made on how to augment the informed ...

متن کامل

Beyond fear. Resolving ethical dilemmas regarding HIV infection.

T he human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, by its devastating nature as an incurable, contagious disease primarily affecting young, previously healthy patients, presents care-givers with many ethical dilemmas. While the epidemic and the dilemmas it creates are novel, the ethical principles at our disposal are well established through our experience with other diseases. In this article we...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Rel. Eng. & Sys. Safety

دوره 93  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008